as some of u
newfags people may know, Modern Warfare 3 and Battlefield 3 are coming out quite soon. as always, i always hear about the rave that MW3 is 'S0 B3@ST0R', and with that, i hear other fanboys sayin 'D00d, BF3 I5 Le1k, W@@@y B3TTr'
and then a flame war ensues.
nah, i'm not here to flame. I just want some opinions and critiques on the 2 games as they appear so far. To keep things relevant, i'll post the links for a major gameplay demo for each game.
MW3 (2 parts):
Soviet Siege of NYC (sad that i can't be the Russians in this :l):
BF3:
Fault Line:
My Opinion:
After watching these 2, this is my opinion: MW3 hasn't really changed since MW1. But after watching the demo, i think that MW3 looks more like a JJ Abrams blockbuster than a desperate fight to rid the soviets from US soil. Also, with all that action going on, i must point out that most of that is scripted, and presents no actual obstacle to the player. It's focused mainly on attacking the infantry in a very exciting situation, Jack Bauer style. You get shot at 100 times, and you never die. Compare this to Battlefield 3, where tactics like flanking, taking cover, and suppressive fire take into effect. Not to mention the sheer increase in level of quality, where it really feels more realistic. However, yes, i agree there are a number of scenes where it's most likely scripted, but not as obvious as MW3. MW3 seems to be less driven by quality, and more on the fact that, hey, they'll get millions of sales regardless. As much as i dislike EA, i must say that Battlefield 3 is looking very promising. Too bad they'll cut server maintenance in a year or so. :/
So, what dost ye persons thinkth?