Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 9:46 am
I'm only a first year, go easy on me.Smokeybacon wrote:And some certain people's grasps of physics are alarmingly bad...
Page 3 of 10
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 9:47 am
Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.Gabe86 wrote:Also, from a biblical standpoint, the bible says that we won't know when or how the world will end.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 9:53 am
The bible, looked at as a primary source and a bibliographical account, can tell as numerous things about ancient societies.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 9:54 am
And the date of Judgement day!Sanjar Khan wrote:The bible, looked at as a primary source and a bibliographical account, can tell as numerous things about ancient societies.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 10:33 am
Wether or not something is a primary source depends on your question. If I am doing research after different bible translations, every translation is a primary source.The bible is NOT a primary source. I don't know why anybody would claim it as such.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 10:47 am
Which is the reason why I just cringe when people quote the bible in retaliation to people quoting accredited scientific papers!Desosus wrote:words
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 11:00 am
Smokeybacon wrote:Which is the reason why I just cringe when people quote the bible in retaliation to people quoting accredited scientific papers!Desosus wrote:words
John 1:1 wrote:In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 3:52 pm
I tried to quote you but edited your post instead, sorryDesosus wrote:Wether or not something is a primary source depends on your question. If I am doing research after different bible translations, every translation is a primary source.The bible is NOT a primary source. I don't know why anybody would claim it as such.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 29th, 2011, 7:12 pm
alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 29th, 2011, 10:43 pm
First intelligent post in this thread.cartmen838213 wrote:alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 30th, 2011, 1:53 am
Smokeybacon wrote:First intelligent post in this thread.cartmen838213 wrote:alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 31st, 2011, 4:45 am
Regarding teleportation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eTUz61L ... grec_index
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eTUz61L ... grec_index
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: October 31st, 2011, 2:47 pm
He thinks america has the most nukes?cartmen838213 wrote:alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE
What a funny thought.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_st ... ar_weapons
http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/n ... tatus.html
Even the bigest nukes ever build arent american.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 1:35 am
i'm assuming that the belief that the U.S. somehow 'won' the cold war coincides with that 'factoid' that the US has the most nukes, cuz, u know, we won dat war that we never had somehow. CCCP got skared of our nukies and satellites that shoot lazrs leik in Star Warz; dey don't wanna be blewn up leik Alderan.
waddaya know, it wasn't a moon after all!
waddaya know, it wasn't a moon after all!
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 2:08 am
It didn't matter who had the most nukes cause both the US and the USSR had enough nukes on their own to obliterate the whole world a few times. Remember the term "overkill". This was pretty much the only thing they were betting with against each other in the end. "We can destroy the world twice!" "And we thrice!"
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 1st, 2011, 10:00 pm
No, they were betting on:
1) The quantity and quality of their nuclear arsenal being sufficient to deter the other nation from launching the first attack and
2) In the case of an actual exchange; the speed, accuracy and co-ordination of their delivery system being better than the opposing side's, hence they can remove all necessary military, production and infrastructure targets quicker and better than the enemy can, and in such a way that the enemy's delivery system will be severely hampered.
Luckily for the world, the first point acted both ways.
1) The quantity and quality of their nuclear arsenal being sufficient to deter the other nation from launching the first attack and
2) In the case of an actual exchange; the speed, accuracy and co-ordination of their delivery system being better than the opposing side's, hence they can remove all necessary military, production and infrastructure targets quicker and better than the enemy can, and in such a way that the enemy's delivery system will be severely hampered.
Luckily for the world, the first point acted both ways.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 9:15 am
Just nuke the darn world and get it over with.
Heideroosjes wrote: Kill kill kill the human race, world would be a better place.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 9:30 pm
*cough*
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 9:54 pm
Matthew 24:36
36" No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
thought i should just throw that out there.
36" No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
thought i should just throw that out there.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 1:44 am
Well, since science supports the Bible, I'm going to take the Bible seriously.Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 2:03 am
Huh?M1_Abrams wrote:Well, since science supports the Bible, I'm going to take the Bible seriously.Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 2:24 am
Lim-Dul wrote:Huh?M1_Abrams wrote:Well, since science supports the Bible, I'm going to take the Bible seriously.Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 2:26 am
The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 3:07 am
It was also written by his disciples, Many of them, Who only wrote what they thought and saw of him, the Bible is not a perfect source of finding the answer to the world ending.M1_Abrams wrote:The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.
But let's be truthful with ourselves, It's getting to be the end of 2011, If 2012 was really the so called end of the world, We would see the world having issues or whatever, volcano eruptions, hell idk, Anything.
It just doesn't logical to believe everything on the internet no matter how many big words or beautiful pictures/videos/animations are used to interpret the views of 2012.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 3:39 am
You are wrong. So very VERY wrong!M1_Abrams wrote:The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 4:00 am
Not sure if serious. ;-)M1_Abrams wrote:The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 4:26 am
So, have any conversations with burning bushes lately? Maybe you spent a couple days inside a whale? Or have you recently decided to take a stroll on top of a lake? Let me know when I'm getting close to the right answer...M1_Abrams wrote:The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.
In case my sarcasm missed, I do not believe the bible to be a source of accurate information. I could go on to flame the bible further, but I believe my point has been made.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 7:18 am
It's a viable source of information. The information is just not very trustworthy.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 9:15 am
I think he trolled.
Re: The World Ending?
Posted: November 8th, 2011, 11:59 am
Anything that has been translated and re-translated many times from multiple ancient and extinct langauges, and rewritten by many monks each of whom probably has their own interpretation of it, and is then split into multiple versions, which cause many wars between members of the same faith over exactly what the orginal version said... yeah I wouldn't take that as a source of any valuable information. Even from a historical point of view, it's bad.