The World Ending?

[Ollieboy]

And some certain people's grasps of physics are alarmingly bad...

I'm only a first year, go easy on me.

[Desosus]

Also, from a biblical standpoint, the bible says that we won't know when or how the world will end.

Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.

[Sanjar Khan]

The bible, looked at as a primary source and a bibliographical account, can tell as numerous things about ancient societies.

[Ollieboy]

The bible, looked at as a primary source and a bibliographical account, can tell as numerous things about ancient societies.

And the date of Judgement day!

[Desosus]

The bible is NOT a primary source. I don't know why anybody would claim it as such.

Wether or not something is a primary source depends on your question. If I am doing research after different bible translations, every translation is a primary source.

[Smokeybacon]

words

Which is the reason why I just cringe when people quote the bible in retaliation to people quoting accredited scientific papers!

[Intertoothh]

words

Which is the reason why I just cringe when people quote the bible in retaliation to people quoting accredited scientific papers!

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

[Sanjar Khan]

The bible is NOT a primary source. I don't know why anybody would claim it as such.

Wether or not something is a primary source depends on your question. If I am doing research after different bible translations, every translation is a primary source.

I tried to quote you but edited your post instead, sorry

[cartmen838213]

alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE

[Smokeybacon]

alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE

First intelligent post in this thread.

[DreamingInsane]

alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE

First intelligent post in this thread.

[tylerthecreator5]

Regarding teleportation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eTUz61L ... grec_index

[Intertoothh]

alright, this is how its gunna go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE

He thinks america has the most nukes?
What a funny thought.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_st ... ar_weapons
http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/n ... tatus.html

Even the bigest nukes ever build arent american.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba

[Cartoonman]

i'm assuming that the belief that the U.S. somehow 'won' the cold war coincides with that 'factoid' that the US has the most nukes, cuz, u know, we won dat war that we never had somehow. CCCP got skared of our nukies and satellites that shoot lazrs leik in Star Warz; dey don't wanna be blewn up leik Alderan.
waddaya know, it wasn't a moon after all!

[Lim-Dul]

It didn't matter who had the most nukes cause both the US and the USSR had enough nukes on their own to obliterate the whole world a few times. Remember the term "overkill". This was pretty much the only thing they were betting with against each other in the end. "We can destroy the world twice!" "And we thrice!"

[Smokeybacon]

No, they were betting on:
1) The quantity and quality of their nuclear arsenal being sufficient to deter the other nation from launching the first attack and
2) In the case of an actual exchange; the speed, accuracy and co-ordination of their delivery system being better than the opposing side's, hence they can remove all necessary military, production and infrastructure targets quicker and better than the enemy can, and in such a way that the enemy's delivery system will be severely hampered.

Luckily for the world, the first point acted both ways.

[Intertoothh]

Just nuke the darn world and get it over with.

Kill kill kill the human race, world would be a better place.

[Cartoonman]

*cough*

[theytookourjobs]

Matthew 24:36
36" No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.

thought i should just throw that out there.

[M1_Abrams]

Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.

Well, since science supports the Bible, I'm going to take the Bible seriously.

[Lim-Dul]

Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.

Well, since science supports the Bible, I'm going to take the Bible seriously.

Huh?

[boblol0909]

Anybody who quotes the bible as a legitimate source of accurate information automatically loses the privilege of being taken seriously.

Well, since science supports the Bible, I'm going to take the Bible seriously.

Huh?

[M1_Abrams]

The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.

[DreamingInsane]

The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.

It was also written by his disciples, Many of them, Who only wrote what they thought and saw of him, the Bible is not a perfect source of finding the answer to the world ending.

But let's be truthful with ourselves, It's getting to be the end of 2011, If 2012 was really the so called end of the world, We would see the world having issues or whatever, volcano eruptions, hell idk, Anything.

It just doesn't logical to believe everything on the internet no matter how many big words or beautiful pictures/videos/animations are used to interpret the views of 2012.

[Desosus]

The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.

You are wrong. So very VERY wrong!

[Lim-Dul]

The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.

Not sure if serious. ;-)

[xN8Gx]

The Bible is a legitimate source of accurate information.

So, have any conversations with burning bushes lately? Maybe you spent a couple days inside a whale? Or have you recently decided to take a stroll on top of a lake? Let me know when I'm getting close to the right answer...

In case my sarcasm missed, I do not believe the bible to be a source of accurate information. I could go on to flame the bible further, but I believe my point has been made.

[Ollieboy]

It's a viable source of information. The information is just not very trustworthy.

[Sanjar Khan]

I think he trolled.

[Smokeybacon]

Anything that has been translated and re-translated many times from multiple ancient and extinct langauges, and rewritten by many monks each of whom probably has their own interpretation of it, and is then split into multiple versions, which cause many wars between members of the same faith over exactly what the orginal version said... yeah I wouldn't take that as a source of any valuable information. Even from a historical point of view, it's bad.