xN8Gx wrote:Please remember, I'm trying to keep this simple. All the little exceptions we have flying around are what's confusing most players that join.
/rules should suffice for that matter. If a player bothers to search for rule information in this forum, he'll most likely be interested in details. However there doesn't exists a source where one can inform himself about details. imo this thread can and should be used to fill that gap.
xN8Gx wrote:Wundsalz wrote:- destruction of natural blocks to get into buildings is allowed.
This is a rule that could really use some work if we want to be bothered having it at all. By that logic, people would need to make the areas around their underground basements obsidian or something to avoid them being tunnelled into legally, which is ridiculous. I personally disagree with this rule in that there is just a horribly drawn line between what is tunnelling and what is grief.
I don't like it as well. Still it has been mentioned quite a couple of times that this is the current policy
[13:02:55] <+SVB> dobby_ashy: in regards to getting into someones house
[13:02:56] <+SVB> [bluehulk4 connected]
[13:03:06] <+SVB> dobby_ashy: am i allowed to break naturally occuring blocks
[13:03:15] <+SVB> dobby_ashy: eg tunnel into their build
[13:03:30] <@intertoothh> yeah... they should block/off stuff like that.
[13:05:08] <@intertoothh> underground houses are hard to protect, or you should make all the walls from wood or something
and thus it should be pointed out here - especially as it is a grey area which might cause confusion.
xN8Gx wrote:Wundsalz and surferdudeX wrote:- using enderperls to teleport through lwc locked doors is forbidden. Also, along with no griefing, no exploiting glitches to raid others homes. Enderpearls are allowed though.
xN8Gx wrote:No mods of any kind, or exploitation of bugs
Technically, being able to enderpearl through a door is a bug. So yeah, got that covered. And Enderpearls are a naturally occuring resource, so why wouldn't they be allowed?
I've seen an ingame discussion and a forum thread with a request for clarification. Furthermore some people used this method quite excessively in the past. Thus i doubt it's a bad idea to include this example in a rule guideline.
I did not state that it was not allowed to use enderperls.
xN8Gx wrote:
Wundsalz wrote:- destruction of blocks placed by other players (without their permission) to get into buildings is considered griefing.
xN8Gx wrote:Do not grief, or in any way damage, someone else's property
If they place a block, then it is theirs. No need to complicate it further then that.
Your formulation doesn't neccessarily lead to the conclusion that removing a block and replacing it instantly is considered griefing. One can argue that "someone else's property" was "damaged in any way", as the build is exactly the same afterwards and noone is harmed due to the modification.
a thread like this is a good spot to point out subtleties like this.
xN8Gx wrote:surferdudeX wrote::
Don't forget that players aren't allowed to attack players in their own homes, unless the owner attacks. Also, no repeated PvP without reason.
The owner SHOULDN'T attack no matter what if they are in a PvP free town. And the second part can be summed up easier; treat others as you'd want to be treated.
Players are not allowed to attack players in their home. Regardless of whether said home is located in a PvP free town or not. Your initial post doesn't cover that aspect. In fact you state the opposite:
xN8Gx wrote:Unless you are in an area that specifies not to pvp, you are allowed to pvp anywhere.